

When specifying cable glands for hazardous area installations, the choice between Ex d (flameproof) and Ex e (increased safety) types is one of the most consequential decisions an electrical engineer will make. Both protection concepts appear across oil & gas, chemical, mining, and pharmaceutical facilities, yet their underlying principles, construction requirements, and installation rules are fundamentally different. This guide explains exactly what separates an Ex d cable gland from an Ex e cable gland, when each applies, and how to select the right type for your specific application.
Metalmech has been a trusted professional manufacturer of Cable Glands since 1997. Metalmech has obtained prestigious certifications including ATEX, IECEx, EAC, IATF, PESO, CE, IP66, IP68, UKAS, NABCB, OHSAS, and RoHS. Browse Ex d and Ex e cable glands in brass and stainless steel, available across all standard thread sizes.
View Our Cable Glands →
Hazardous area protection methods are governed by the IEC 60079 series of standards. Each protection concept is assigned a two-letter code and addresses a specific ignition risk in a different way. Ex d and Ex e represent two of the most widely used approaches in industrial electrical installations worldwide.
Ex d, defined under IEC 60079-1, is a protection concept built on containment. An Ex d enclosure is designed to withstand an internal explosion of a flammable gas mixture and to prevent the propagation of that explosion to the surrounding atmosphere. The enclosure does not prevent ignition inside, it contains and quenches the explosion, cooling escaping gases through precisely machined flame paths so they exit below the ignition temperature of the surrounding atmosphere.
A cable gland used with an Ex d enclosure must therefore maintain the integrity of this containment. It must not allow gas to migrate through the cable and enter the enclosure from outside, and it must itself be capable of resisting internal explosion pressure. This is why Ex d cable glands are robust, metal-bodied devices with certified thread engagement depths, and typically require a compound-filled barrier to seal around individual conductors.
Ex e, defined under IEC 60079-7, takes a fundamentally different approach. Rather than containing an explosion, increased safety equipment is designed to prevent ignition in the first place. Ex e enclosures and terminals are constructed to a higher standard than general industrial equipment, with enhanced creepage and clearance distances, higher ingress protection ratings, and tight control over surface temperatures, so that arcs, sparks, and excessive heat simply do not occur in normal or specified abnormal operating conditions.
An Ex e cable gland must therefore deliver a certified level of ingress protection (typically IP54 or higher), maintain a reliable mechanical seal against the cable, and meet the dimensional and material requirements set out in IEC 60079-7. It does not need to withstand explosion pressure, but it must not introduce any path for moisture, dust, or contaminants that could compromise the enclosure’s safety rating.
An Ex d cable gland works in two distinct zones simultaneously. At the enclosure entry, it provides a certified threaded connection with a defined flame path length that resists and quenches any internal explosion pressure before gases can escape to the outer atmosphere. Inside the cable entry chamber, a compound, typically a two-part epoxy resin or putty, is injected around the individual conductors to fill every interstitial void within the cable. This compound barrier prevents flammable gas from migrating along the cable’s interstices from the outside hazardous atmosphere into the protected enclosure interior.
The combination of a pressure-resistant enclosure connection and a gas-impermeable internal seal makes the Ex d cable gland the only type suitable for use with flameproof enclosures in the most demanding gas groups and zones.
An Ex e cable gland achieves its protection through mechanical compression alone. A clamping or compression element tightens against the outer sheath of the cable to form a seal that meets the required IP rating. A second clamping element grips the cable to provide strain relief and prevent the cable being pulled through the gland under load.
There is no compound filling and no internal conductor-level seal. The assumption built into IEC 60079-7 is that an increased safety enclosure will not experience internal ignition, so preventing gas migration into the enclosure is less critical than maintaining a robust, durable external seal that keeps the enclosure’s ingress protection intact throughout its service life.
Ex d cable glands are precision-machined, heavy-duty components. Key construction features include:
Ex e cable glands are designed around reliable, long-term mechanical sealing. Their key features include:
| Characteristic | Ex d Cable Gland (Flameproof) | Ex e Cable Gland (Increased Safety) |
|---|---|---|
| Protection concept | Containment, contains & quenches internal explosion | Prevention, eliminates ignition sources |
| Governing standard | IEC 60079-1 (ATEX, IECEx) | IEC 60079-7 (ATEX, IECEx) |
| Sealing method | Compound/resin around individual conductors | Elastomeric compression seal on outer sheath |
| Gas migration prevention | Full compound barrier through cable core | Outer sheath seal only, no conductor-level barrier |
| Explosion pressure resistance | Yes, rated to withstand internal pressure | Not required, enclosure prevents ignition |
| Zone suitability | Zone 1, Zone 2 | Zone 1, Zone 2 (Ex e enclosures only) |
| Gas group suitability | IIA, IIB, IIC (hydrogen, acetylene) | IIA, IIB, IIC, per equipment certificate |
| Compatible enclosure type | Ex d (flameproof) enclosures only | Ex e (increased safety) enclosures only |
| Compound filling required | Yes, mandatory for certified performance | No |
| Body material options | Nickel-plated brass, 316 SS | Nickel-plated brass, 316 SS |
| IP rating | IP66 / IP68 | IP54 minimum; IP66 / IP68 available |
| Installation complexity | Higher, compound filling and cure required | Lower, mechanical assembly only |
| Cable reuse on gland removal | No, compound is permanent | Yes, elastomeric seals can be replaced |
| Certification marking | II 2 G Ex d IIC Gb / IECEx | II 2 G Ex e IIC Gb / IECEx |
Both Ex d and Ex e cable glands are used in Zone 1 and Zone 2 hazardous areas, but they are never interchangeable. The gland type must match the protection concept of the enclosure it is fitted to.
Zone 1 areas are those where a flammable gas atmosphere is likely to occur periodically during normal operation. Both Ex d and Ex e enclosures, and their respective cable glands, are suitable for Zone 1. The choice depends entirely on which protection concept the equipment manufacturer has designed and certified the enclosure to.
Zone 2 areas are locations where a flammable atmosphere is unlikely to occur in normal operation and, if it does occur, will persist only for a short period. Both Ex d and Ex e equipment are permitted in Zone 2. In practice, Ex e equipment is sometimes preferred in Zone 2 where the lower installation complexity of an Ex e gland is advantageous and the risk profile supports it.
Gas group classification, IIA (propane), IIB (ethylene), IIC (hydrogen, acetylene), determines how easily a gas can be ignited and how an explosion propagates. IIC is the most demanding group. Ex d cable glands certified to IIC must have flame path dimensions engineered to quench hydrogen and acetylene explosions, which requires tighter tolerances and longer paths than IIA or IIB equipment. Always verify that the gas group marked on the cable gland certificate matches or exceeds the gas group of the installation area.
This standard defines the complete construction, testing, and marking requirements for flameproof equipment and the cable entry devices used with it. It specifies minimum thread engagement lengths, flame path tolerances, explosion pressure test requirements, and, critically, the requirement that cable entry devices must prevent gas migration through the cable. This is the technical basis for the compound-filled barrier in Ex d cable glands.
This standard covers increased safety equipment design and verification. For cable entry devices used with Ex e enclosures, it specifies minimum IP ratings, mechanical strength requirements for cable retention, maximum operating temperatures for sealing materials, and creepage and clearance requirements at the cable entry point.
The installation standard that brings the equipment standards together. It governs how cable glands are selected and installed in practice, and it requires that the cable gland type matches the protection concept of the enclosure being served. The current edition includes the well-known 3-metre rule, which specifies that barrier-type cable glands are generally required for cable runs exceeding 3 metres entering Ex d equipment.
The European regulatory framework requiring CE marking and third-party notified body certification for all equipment intended for use in explosive atmospheres. Both Ex d and Ex e cable glands sold for European installations must carry ATEX certification with the appropriate equipment category marking.
The international equivalent of ATEX, recognised across the Asia-Pacific region, Middle East, Africa, and Latin America. Many cable gland manufacturers obtain dual ATEX and IECEx certification to enable global project deployment without country-by-country re-certification.
Selecting between an Ex d and Ex e cable gland is not a matter of preference, it is dictated by the protection concept of the enclosure and the requirements of IEC 60079-14. The decision process follows these steps:
Ex d cable gland installation is a skilled, multi-step process. The critical difference from a standard installation is the compound filling stage. Once the gland body is threaded into the enclosure to the correct torque, the individual conductors must be spread apart within the barrier chamber and the sealing compound injected or packed until all voids are completely filled. The compression nut is then tightened to distribute and pressurise the compound. The circuit must not be energised until the compound has fully cured to the manufacturer’s specified time, typically 24 hours at ambient temperature for most two-part epoxy systems.
Incorrect compound application is the leading cause of Ex d cable gland certification failures during inspection. Common errors include insufficient compound volume, air voids trapped between conductors, and premature energisation before cure is complete.
Ex e cable gland installation is mechanically simpler but still requires care to achieve the certified IP rating. The outer sheath seal must be tightened to the manufacturer’s specified torque, under-tightening results in poor IP performance, while over-tightening can damage the elastomeric sealing element and compromise the seal over time. The cable retention clamp must be tightened independently to the specified torque to ensure strain relief without relying on the sealing element for mechanical grip.
No. Ex d and Ex e are different protection concepts with different design requirements. Using an Ex d gland on an Ex e enclosure does not provide the correct sealing performance for the increased safety concept and will not be accepted by inspection authorities. Always match the gland type to the enclosure protection concept.
No. Ex e cable glands use mechanical compression seals on the cable’s outer sheath. Compound filling is not required and should not be applied unless specifically directed by the enclosure manufacturer. The Ex e concept does not rely on preventing gas migration through cable interstices.
Ex d cable glands are typically more expensive than Ex e glands of equivalent size and material, reflecting their more complex construction, heavier machining, and the additional compound system required. Total installed cost should also account for the additional labour involved in compound filling and the cure time before energisation.
In many cases, yes, the elastomeric sealing elements can be replaced and the gland refitted to a new cable. This should always be done with new sealing elements rather than reusing the original components, and the gland body should be inspected for damage before reuse. Ex d glands with cured compound cannot be reused.
For European installations, look for ATEX certification with CE marking and the appropriate equipment group and category (e.g., II 2 G for Zone 1 gas). For international projects, IECEx certification from an accredited Certification Body is required. Dual ATEX + IECEx certified products simplify global project procurement.
The 3-metre cable length rule in IEC 60079-14 specifically applies to cable entry into Ex d (flameproof) enclosures. It governs when a barrier-type gland is required versus a non-barrier gland at Ex d equipment. It does not apply to Ex e installations, where the gland selection is driven by the mechanical and IP requirements of IEC 60079-7.
Yes. Both types are available in 316L stainless steel for installations in marine, offshore, subsea, or chemically aggressive environments where nickel-plated brass would be subject to accelerated corrosion. Stainless steel versions are also used where stringent hygiene requirements apply, such as in pharmaceutical and food processing facilities.
Metalmech is proudly approved by major organizations such as ADNOC, EIL, Petroleum Development Oman, and KPC (Kuwait Petroleum Corporation).